Oct 10, 2022 | Georgia School of Orthodontics

Share

At A Glance: Clear Aligner Therapy Remains in High Demand by Ricky E. Harrell, DMD, MA

By Ricky E. Harrell, DMD, MA On Oct 10, 2022

The allure of clear aligner therapy is easy to understand. In light of the benefits offered by this approach, interest from patients and providers is ramping up as advances in technology have broadened the scope of what can be treated with aligners.

Noting that “today’s aligners are not what they were 15 years ago,” Ricky E. Harrell, DMD, MA, program director for the Georgia School of Orthodontics, points to the advantages of aligner therapy: an esthetic appearance during treatment, easier maintenance and oral hygiene, and shorter treatment time. Compared to fixed orthodontics, he reports additional benefits, as well, including fewer appointments and faster chairtime during maintenance visits.

As dentists respond to growing demand and new options in aligner technology, more practices are embracing this esthetic option. However, Harrell cautions that before adding aligner services, providers need a clear understanding of orthodontics and the limitations of tooth movement. Without sufficient knowledge of these critical elements, treatment may fall short of the anticipated outcome. Similarly, providers should recognize situations in which this approach is an inferior choice to traditional orthodontics.

Another necessity is access to technology that allows adequate treatment documentation. This includes radiographs of the teeth and surrounding bone. A panoramic radiograph is just part of the diagnostic record, however, as Harrell asserts that cephalometric imaging is “absolutely necessary” to plan safe tooth movement. In addition, intraoral scans are typically required for aligner fabrication, which represents another investment for practices that are not already set up for digital impressions.

Case selection is also paramount to successful aligner care. “While fixed appliances can be used to manage almost all orthodontic situations, aligners cannot make the same claim,” Harrell explains. Consequently, clinicians should understand the types of cases indicated for clear aligner therapy, and which require orthodontic referral. He suggests most general practitioners limit treatment to mild to moderate Class I malocclusions for correction of rotations and malalignment, as well as cosmetic changes. In cases involving malocclusions with a moderate or significant skeletal component, referral to an orthodontist is recommended. “Collaboration is needed anytime the dentist realizes treatment is not progressing as expected,” he adds. “Of course, patient compliance is vital because if the aligners are not worn as prescribed, the result will not reflect the anticipated outcome.”

Unlike fixed orthodontics, a key advantage is that aligners are self-governing. “This means that a set of trays can only accomplish the tooth movement that was programmed into them,” Harrell says. “They cannot cause unintended movement, as can occur when maintenance is lacking with fixed appliances.”

As noted, another benefit is that oral hygiene is easier to maintain during treatment. “We do not see the patterns of decalcification with aligners like we do with fixed appliances,” he observes. “The ability to remove the appliance for professional or self-care mitigates some of the most difficult issues associated with fixed appliance therapy.”

Today’s patients also have the option of do-it-yourself treatment in which a company fabricates aligners from either the patient’s self-taken impression or a technician’s scan. Harrell condemns this approach as ill-conceived and unethical, saying, “When an oral screening and examination are not incorporated as part of treatment, we raise the opportunity for pathology and disease to go undiagnosed. Patients should only seek care under the direct supervision of a licensed and trained professional.”

From a clinical perspective, that is prudent advice — and given growing demand for esthetic treatment and the advantages of clear aligners, this approach will continue to gain traction in offices across the country. Yet only through appropriate treatment planning and understanding the core principles of tooth movement can dentists hope to harness the increasingly sophisticated capabilities of modern aligner therapy.

Decisions in Dentistry, October 2022
Click Here for original article

GSO Experts

Dr. Ricky E. Harrell

Dr. Ricky E. Harrell//

Program Director Emeritus,
Diplomate of the ABO

Related

Nov 07, 2025

Georgia School of Orthodontics Recognizes Mauricio Gonzalez, Ph.D. as Chairman of the Board of Trustees

ATLANTA, GA / ACCESS Newswire / October 31, 2025 / The Georgia School of Orthodontics (GSO) proudly recognizes Dr. Mauricio Gonzalez, who was appointed Chairman of the GSO Board of Trustees earlier this year. Under Dr. Gonzalez’s leadership, the Board continues to guide GSO’s mission of excellence in education, clinical innovation, and community service. Dr…

Article
Mar 13, 2020

Guest Editorial: Do-It-Yourself Aligner Therapy Is Bad Medicine

Initiating orthodontic aligner treatment without direct supervision of a dental professional increases the risk of oral complications and adverse outcomes. By Ricky E. Harrell, DMD, MA On Mar 13, 2020   In 1997, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration relaxed regulations requiring pharmaceutical companies to list side effects when promoting their medications. This heralded the start of direct-to-consumer drug..

Article
Sep 11, 2018

Latest Features: Intraoral Scanning in Orthodontic Practice by Ricky E. Harrell, DMD, MA

An evidence-based evaluation of three-dimensional scanning technology in orthodontic practice. By Ricky E. Harrell, DMD, MA On Sep 11, 2018 An evidence-based evaluation of three-dimensional scanning technology in orthodontic practice. One of the challenges in providing orthodontic treatment is deciding which technology to utilize. Considerations include the purchase and support of the technology, training, the chairtime and lab..

Article